Cosmetic changes
This commit is contained in:
parent
f868420725
commit
3a324ad757
@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#undef HAVE___FUNCTION__
|
||||
|
||||
/* HAVE___FUNCTION__
|
||||
* __FUNCTION__ is another name for __func__, provided for backward
|
||||
* compatibility with old versions of GCC.
|
||||
* Although it is seemingly available everywhere else.
|
||||
/* __FUNCTION__ is another name for __func__, provided for backward
|
||||
* compatibility with old versions of GCC. Although it is seemingly
|
||||
* available everywhere else.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define HAVE___FUNCTION__ 1
|
||||
|
@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#undef HAVE___func__
|
||||
|
||||
/* HAVE___func__
|
||||
* __func__ was added to the standard in C99 and C++11. But seemingly exists
|
||||
/* __func__ was added to the standard in C99 and C++11. But seemingly exists
|
||||
* almost everywhere before that as well.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2,6 +2,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#undef SIZEOF_PTHREAD_T
|
||||
|
||||
/* Using the size of pointer appears to be a reasonable heuristics and
|
||||
* __SIZEOF_POINTER__ is availbale everywhere where we have pthread (see
|
||||
* SIZEOF_POINTER.h for details). Note also that we have a test that verifies
|
||||
* this assumption.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifndef _MSC_VER
|
||||
# ifdef __SIZEOF_POINTER__
|
||||
# define SIZEOF_PTHREAD_T __SIZEOF_POINTER__
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user